For an FCA-regulated financial services firm, IT support is about more than keeping systems running.
Technology supports client communications, access to data, transactions, reporting and day-to-day service delivery. When a critical system fails, the consequences can extend beyond employee downtime. Disruption may affect customers, interrupt important business services, expose sensitive information or create regulatory reporting considerations.
This changes what financial firms should expect from managed IT for financial services.
Managed IT for financial services should help an organisation maintain a secure, controlled and resilient technology environment. It should also give the firm sufficient visibility to understand how its systems are being managed and how effectively technology risks are being addressed.
Choosing a managed service provider is therefore a risk-management decision, not simply a question of cost or convenience.
Why Managed IT For Financial Services Is Different
Every organisation expects its IT provider to resolve technical problems, monitor systems and help employees remain productive.
Financial services firms require those capabilities too, but they operate in an environment where technology can directly affect client confidence, operational continuity and regulatory responsibilities.
The FCA’s operational resilience requirements require firms within scope to understand the business services whose disruption could cause significant harm, establish how much disruption could be tolerated and assess the resources needed to deliver those services. Those resources can include IT infrastructure, applications, data, people and third-party providers.
An MSP supporting a regulated organisation must therefore be able to do more than close support tickets. It should help the firm maintain oversight of its technology, understand important dependencies and obtain reliable information when an incident occurs.
However, outsourcing IT management does not transfer regulatory accountability to the provider. The regulated firm remains responsible for its governance, resilience arrangements and reporting decisions.
A suitable MSP supports those responsibilities rather than claiming to assume them.
What Should An FCA-Regulated Firm Expect From Its MSP?
The right approach to managed IT for financial services will depend on the organisation’s activities, systems and risk profile. However, several requirements should form part of any provider assessment.
Clear Responsibilities And Service Evidence
A financial services organisation should know which parts of its technology environment the MSP manages, what is monitored and how responsibilities are divided.
Service reports, change records, incident histories and documented escalation procedures provide evidence of how the environment is being managed. They can support internal reviews, supplier assessments, audits and investigations.
The objective is not documentation for its own sake. It is ensuring that the organisation can obtain an accurate picture of its IT environment when a decision needs to be made.
Service Levels Based On Business Impact
A standard service-level agreement does not automatically support operational resilience.
Response and recovery expectations should reflect the importance of the affected system. A minor problem with an internal application does not carry the same consequence as the failure of a system supporting client communications, regulated data or time-sensitive transactions.
A suitable MSP should prioritise incidents according to business impact, not simply the order in which support requests arrive.
The provider can supply response targets, recovery information and technical support. The regulated firm must determine whether those arrangements are appropriate for the services it delivers.
Visibility Of Technology Dependencies
Financial firms frequently depend on cloud platforms, business applications, identity systems, connectivity providers and specialist third-party services.
These relationships are not always obvious. An application might appear to operate independently while relying on external authentication, cloud infrastructure, data connections or another supplier.
A managed IT provider should help the organisation understand the systems within its remit and how they connect. Greater visibility makes it easier to identify concentrated risk, establish escalation procedures and anticipate the likely effect of an outage.
Appropriate Management Of Sensitive Information
Financial services organisations may hold personal data, client records, regulated communications and commercially sensitive information across multiple platforms and devices.
The provider’s access to those environments therefore requires careful control.
Financial firms should ask how administrative privileges are granted, reviewed and removed, how technical activity is recorded and how the MSP protects its own accounts and systems.
The provider should also be able to explain these controls clearly enough for non-technical stakeholders to understand the protections in place.
A Defined Incident-Management Process
During a serious incident, the quality of the information available to decision-makers can matter as much as the speed of the technical response.
The organisation may need to establish:
- What has happened
- Which systems and services are affected
- Whether information has been compromised
- How customers or counterparties may be affected
- What containment and recovery work is under way
- Whether regulatory, legal or insurance notification should be considered
An MSP should have a clear process for escalating significant incidents and providing accurate technical information throughout investigation and recovery.
New FCA rules covering operational incident and material third-party reporting come into effect on 18 March 2027, making reliable incident information and supplier oversight increasingly important. The responsibility for determining whether an incident must be reported remains with the regulated firm.
Why A Generic MSP May Fall Short
Many MSPs can manage Microsoft 365, maintain devices, monitor infrastructure and respond to helpdesk requests.
The distinction is whether they understand what managed IT for financial services requires and the environment in which regulated firms operate.
A provider supporting an FCA-regulated organisation should appreciate why evidence, accountability and structured escalation matter. It should understand why a technical problem can quickly become an operational, governance or regulatory concern.
This understanding affects how the provider:
- Prioritises support
- Documents changes
- Protects administrative access
- Escalates incidents
- Reports on system performance
- Supports resilience testing
- Communicates with senior stakeholders
The MSP does not need to act as the firm’s compliance adviser. It does, however, need to understand why the organisation requires disciplined technology management and dependable evidence.
How Managed IT Supports Operational Resilience
Technology needs to be considered in relation to the services the financial organisation delivers.
A managed IT provider can support operational resilience by helping the firm maintain accurate technical information, identify infrastructure dependencies and understand the effects of system failure.
This may include:
- Maintaining inventories of managed systems and devices
- Monitoring infrastructure availability and performance
- Documenting technical dependencies
- Supporting backup and recovery arrangements
- Providing evidence during resilience reviews
- Recording incidents, causes and remediation work
- Helping test whether recovery processes work as expected
There is an important boundary.
The MSP can contribute technical information, monitoring and recovery expertise, but it cannot define the firm’s important business services, approve its impact tolerances or own its regulatory approach.
This distinction is central to FCA operational resilience compliance: documented processes matter, but firms must also be able to demonstrate that their arrangements can work during genuine disruption.
Managing Cloud And Cyber Security Risk
Cloud services are part of the operating model of many financial firms.
Microsoft 365, Microsoft Azure and hosted business applications can support flexible and resilient working. However, moving technology into the cloud does not remove the need for oversight.
The firm still needs to understand who has access, how services are configured, where information is held and how operations would continue if a platform or connection became unavailable.
Cloud environments should therefore be governed as part of the wider technology estate rather than treated as self-managing services. This includes appropriate controls around identity, administration, configuration, backup and recovery.
Cyber security should also be integrated into everyday IT management.
Account management, device configuration, security updates, endpoint protection, access permissions and backup monitoring all influence the organisation’s exposure. When IT and cyber security are managed separately without clear ownership, gaps can emerge between teams, systems and suppliers.
Financial firms should establish:
- Which security controls are included within the managed service
- Who reviews alerts and potential incidents
- How weaknesses and threats are escalated
- Which controls require a specialist security service
- How IT and cyber security teams work together
- What reporting and evidence the organisation receives
Establishing these responsibilities is an important part of cyber security for financial services, particularly where managed IT, specialist security services and internal teams share responsibility for protecting the same environment.
This avoids the assumption that purchasing managed IT automatically covers every cyber security requirement.
Preparing The IT Environment For AI
AI adoption introduces further questions around access, information governance and accountability.
Before tools such as Microsoft Copilot or other AI platforms are adopted more widely, financial firms need to understand what information their users and applications can access.
A managed IT provider can support the technical preparation by reviewing identities, permissions, device management, information access and the configuration of approved platforms.
The MSP does not own the firm’s AI governance. Its role is to help ensure that the underlying technology environment supports the controls the organisation intends to apply.
Different Financial Firms Have Different Requirements
There is no single IT model for the financial services sector.
An asset manager may have different systems and operational dependencies from an independent financial adviser. The requirements of a hedge fund, wealth manager, commercial finance broker or capital markets business can differ again.
This is why managed IT for financial services should begin with an understanding of the organisation’s operating model rather than a standard package. Akita’s work with a London-based commercial finance broker provides an example: its IT support for ASC Finance includes day-to-day support alongside backup and recovery, as well as support for the firm’s CRM environment.
For financial firms in London, the City and Canary Wharf, as well as organisations operating across the UK, sector experience can provide useful assurance that the MSP understands the demands surrounding availability, sensitive information and regulated operations.
Location alone is not enough. The more important consideration is whether the provider combines accessible support with the necessary technical, security and sector knowledge.
Managed IT is primarily concerned with the ongoing management and support of the technology environment. Where a financial firm is planning broader change, IT consultancy for financial services can help connect decisions around infrastructure, cloud platforms, security and digital development with the organisation’s longer-term operational priorities.
How To Assess A Managed IT Provider
When reviewing a potential provider, financial firms should ask:
- How will responsibilities be divided and documented?
- How are business-critical incidents prioritised?
- What information will be available during an incident?
- How is administrative access controlled and reviewed?
- What service and security reports will we receive?
- How will the provider support recovery testing?
- What happens if one of the provider’s own suppliers fails?
- What financial services experience can it demonstrate?
- Which independent standards or accreditations does it hold?
The provider’s own security practices should form part of this assessment.
Speak To Akita’s Financial Services IT Team
The value of managed IT for financial services lies in reducing uncertainty around the technology on which the organisation depends, while giving firms greater visibility over how critical systems are managed and supported.
The regulated firm retains responsibility for its governance and regulatory decisions. Its provider should supply the technical management, evidence and support needed to maintain a secure, controlled and resilient environment.
Through its managed IT support for financial services, Akita supports financial firms in London, Canary Wharf and across the UK, combining day-to-day IT management with expertise across cloud, cyber security and longer-term technology planning.
Akita’s own security credentials include ISO 27001 certification, alongside Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus assessment services and CREST-accredited penetration testing capabilities.
If you are reviewing your current IT arrangements or considering outsourced IT support, speak to Akita’s financial services IT team.
Contact Us
